<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="de">
	<id>https://falone.eu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=OLDBettina</id>
	<title>MeWi - Benutzerbeiträge [de]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://falone.eu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=OLDBettina"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Spezial:Beitr%C3%A4ge/OLDBettina"/>
	<updated>2026-04-28T19:28:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Benutzerbeiträge</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Battlefield_6_Insider_Says_The_Game_Will_Be_%E2%80%98What_Fans_Want%E2%80%99&amp;diff=59530</id>
		<title>Battlefield 6 Insider Says The Game Will Be ‘What Fans Want’</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Battlefield_6_Insider_Says_The_Game_Will_Be_%E2%80%98What_Fans_Want%E2%80%99&amp;diff=59530"/>
		<updated>2026-04-10T14:40:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OLDBettina: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Assuming Battlefield still wants to revisit other pivotal points in history, there is one time period the franchise touched on very briefly. Returning to Vietnam would be perfect for the Battlefield franchise because the combat during the Vietnam War emphasizes what the series has done best. Plus, a vignette-style campaign like in Battlefield 1 but set during the Vietnam War could be incredibly interesting, and considering the many diverse perspectives the player could view the war through would provide a very compelling story. Chaotic firefights in jungles, lush and varied scenery, and paired with destruction Battlefield is known for, a Vietnam time period would evoke serious Bad Company 2 vi&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Despite the most recent claims, **Battlefield 6 ** is actually going to be what fans of the series want, according to an industry insider. The statement contradicts the latest round of leaked information courtesy of Anton Logvinov, video game journalist and insi&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Battlefield needs to reinvent its image , and that could be as simple as looking to the past to inspire the future. The Bad Company games in particular would be a good start, as these games never truly took themselves seriously. Even though Bad Company 2 eschewed a lot of the silliness from the first game, multiplayer in Battlefield: Bad Company 2 was the right balance of simulation vs. fun factor. Battlefield could definitely use a dose of that nowadays, especially after Battlefield&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Quite recently, Russian industry insider Anton Logvinov shared a brief statement on Twitter claiming that Battlefield 6 is not what fans want, although it plays well. Judging by his subsequent commentaries, the insider hasn’t played the game himself while the information was probably coming from third parties participating in closed testing. Shortly after that, another industry insider, Tom Henderson,  [https://battlefield2042pedia.com/ battlefield2042Pedia.com] claimed the contrary stating that Battlefield 6 will actually be what fans of the series want . Interestingly, the source of Henderson’s confidence is pretty much the same as Logvinov’s concerns. According to those participating in internal testing, the game is receiving significantly more positive feedback than the previous titles. This reception makes Henderson believe that DICE is handling Battlefield 6 in a way that should satisfy f&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Regardless, it will be some time until Battlefield fans find out which leaker is correct and the friendly debate on the latest game&#039;s fan appeal is fully settled. Until then, messing around with the builds of Battlefield maps in Minecraft seems like a fun way for hardcore fans to start the waiting process for the reveal, as it seems like it is going to be a long &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Battlefield has had an issue in the past with destruction not having any recognizable impact on gameplay. Previous titles like Battlefield: Bad Company 2 used to integrate the capability of destruction into its level design, which is partially what made Bad Company 2 one of the best games in the whole series. Games like Battlefield 3 onward tried to replicate the importance of destruction in different ways, but the &amp;quot;Levolution&amp;quot; mechanics ended up being lackluster in comparison. Alternatively, a higher player density in multiplayer games could make games like Conquest a bit more strategic with squad placements. Any capability to add more players on screen/in the lobby is perfect for Battlefield , which thrives on simulating large-scale warf&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Of course, the Battlefield franchise could surprise fans with something completely new for the series. Perhaps not as outlandish Battlefield Hardline , but something like a completely new time period or setting. There&#039;s still a variety of conflicts throughout world history that many games, not just Battlefield , still haven&#039;t tackled in a video game. Conflicts like the American Civil War, the Korean War, and the modern 20th century Middle Eastern conflicts come to mind. Any one of those wars would be a wild departure for the series thus far, but would be incredibly unique. It would give a chance for players to get to know some of the lesser conflicts in world history that are worth know&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;During EA Play&#039;s 2020 Live showcase, there was an interesting tidbit shared at the end of the show from chief studios officer Laura Miele. Towards the end of the showcase, EA showed off some very early next-gen development footage from EA&#039;s first-party development studios like BioWare, Criterion, and DICE. &amp;quot;Our studios are taking their crazy, ambitious ideas and making them real,&amp;quot; stated Miele. &amp;quot;Every console generation DICE sets the bar for excellence in audio and visual presentation. We are creating epic battles at a scale and fidelity unlike anything you&#039;ve experienced before.&amp;quot; This is almost certainly in reference to Battlefield 6 , or whatever Battlefield title is currently in the works for 2&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;At the beginning of November, EA revealed that Battlefield 6 would offer an unprecedented scale of warfare , which became possible thanks to the now-current generation of powerful consoles. The company’s CEO Andrew Wilson shared the exciting news that the game is receiving highly positive feedback during the current phase of internal testing. Battlefield 6 is heavily rumored to return to the modern era while the aforementioned scale will reportedly result in supporting up to 128 players in a single multiplayer ma&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OLDBettina</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Battlefield_6_Insider_Says_The_Game_Will_Be_%E2%80%98What_Fans_Want%E2%80%99&amp;diff=59525</id>
		<title>Battlefield 6 Insider Says The Game Will Be ‘What Fans Want’</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Battlefield_6_Insider_Says_The_Game_Will_Be_%E2%80%98What_Fans_Want%E2%80%99&amp;diff=59525"/>
		<updated>2026-04-10T14:31:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OLDBettina: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One of the defining aspects of Battlefield since the beginning has always been destruction. The mechanics have iterated and changed over the years, but in more recent titles in the franchise, destruction seems to have unintentionally become less important. Games like Bad Company and Battlefield 3 used to employ destruction in a functionally relevant manner, making the mechanic an integral part of the environment design. Playing Rush in Bad Company 2 g…“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;One of the defining aspects of Battlefield since the beginning has always been destruction. The mechanics have iterated and changed over the years, but in more recent titles in the franchise, destruction seems to have unintentionally become less important. Games like Bad Company and Battlefield 3 used to employ destruction in a functionally relevant manner, making the mechanic an integral part of the environment design. Playing Rush in Bad Company 2 generally meant blowing holes into M-COM stations to breach and set a charge, or even take the whole building down if that&#039;s more via&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For players still playing Battlefield 5 , the game recently saw the addition of new skins as October ended. While the wait for more Battlefield 6 details may seem never-ending, dressing up in Battlefield 5 ’s Halloween skins should make it a tiny bit more bearable – even if only for a little wh&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The best way for Battlefield 6 to make itself feel truly next generation will be environmental destruction. Environmental destruction in multiplayer games is not totally new, but it has always been a double edged sword. It creates a sense of realism, immersion, and tactical fluidity, but typically suffers from buginess , inconsistent implementation, and can often be exploited in game-breaking ways. If Battlefield 6 can get anywhere close to perfecting environmental destruction on a large scale, it will instantly set itself apart from the herd. Buildable defenses, crumbling buildings, and artillery craters all worked well in Battlefield V , but taking that design element to the next level is a m&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Battlefield 6 developer DICE is well known for its quality products. Even though its Star Wars Battlefront games garnered high-profile controversy due to truly unfortunate microtransactions implementation by publisher EA, the base experience delivered by the development team was always unique and polished. The thing that DICE gets right in both Battlefield and Battlefront is the cinematic experience: so many moments in these games provide a sense of scale, grandeur, and chaos that is unparalleled in any other &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Then the Modern Warfare reboot implemented Gunsmith , which leveraged its perk systems with an obscene level of weapon customization. Players could choose up to five different attachments from a selection of nine categories, ranging from weapon muzzles to ammo capacities. The freedom in choice is massive, allowing for various builds on weapons that would either be invalidated or at least considered weaker in previous Call of Duty games. Loosening the attachment restrictions has lead to a wealth of variety in weapon choice and customizat&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;There&#039;s options, and in a game like Battlefield , options are what make the games interesting. Implementing a Gunsmith-like system would make the soldier classes feel less linear/restricting, whilst also allowing players to fulfill specific roles dependa&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The last two Battlefield games have been set in World War I and World War II respectively, and while both of those setting are rife with interesting moments, great locales , and mountains of fun weapons and vehicles, it seems that most FPS players are leaning back towards modern settings. Luckily, many players are also craving a level of realism that Battlefield typically delivers in spades, which means Battlefield 6 will be well positioned to fill that r&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone are shaping up to be the biggest competition to Battlefield 6 , even with CoD 2020 and [https://battlefield2042pedia.com/ Learn Alot more] on the horizon, and there is a lot of ground to cover for the next Battlefield to compete with what is arguably the most popular Call of Duty game ever in years. Call of Duty games have long been the industry standard for first person shooters, as any FPS title will inevitably be compared to the CoD game de jour, and big-budget shooters have to set themselves apart to make an impact. There are a few reasons that competing with Modern Warfare will be extra difficult for Battlefield&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Battlefield 6 is a next-gen game with a next-gen release date, with the game planned to launch sometime in the fiscal year 2022. That narrows it down to a launch window between October 2021 to September 2022. Traditionally, Battlefield releases in the fall with many of the year&#039;s other heavy-hitters, so, a fall 2021 release date seems like the most likely possibility. That means Battlefield 6 won&#039;t be competing with the next Call of Duty, it will exist in the wake of it and compete with the entry after that, which will presumably be from Sledgehammer games. The typical Call of Duty developer rotation has become a bit jumbled lately, as Sledgehammer&#039;s next Call of Duty has reportedly had a troubled development cyc&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Controversial inside scoops are most likely based on feedback from several playtesters whose excitement over **Battlefield 6 ** varies drastically from person to person. In other words, the tone of these leaks and claims depends on a personal attitude. Obviously, for a proper conclusion, the title needs to be revealed publicly, which will happen in spring 2021. Until then, there’s no reason to believe any of the reports - unless they are significantly solidified by specific credible informat&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OLDBettina</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Battlefield_6_Should_Utilize_One_Of_Modern_Warfare_s_Best_Features&amp;diff=59513</id>
		<title>Battlefield 6 Should Utilize One Of Modern Warfare s Best Features</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Battlefield_6_Should_Utilize_One_Of_Modern_Warfare_s_Best_Features&amp;diff=59513"/>
		<updated>2026-04-10T14:18:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OLDBettina: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If EA manages to impress gamers with the upcoming Battlefield game, and Call of Duty manages to keep its success with Black Ops Cold War , the debate of which FPS game to play could come back to light. Call of Duty will be challenged to keep coming up with more great ideas to keep their fans hooked. Firstly, though, Black Ops Cold War will release first sometime in November. _Battlefield 6 _ doesn&amp;#039;t have an exact release date yet, and won&amp;#039;t be coming…“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If EA manages to impress gamers with the upcoming Battlefield game, and Call of Duty manages to keep its success with Black Ops Cold War , the debate of which FPS game to play could come back to light. Call of Duty will be challenged to keep coming up with more great ideas to keep their fans hooked. Firstly, though, Black Ops Cold War will release first sometime in November. _Battlefield 6 _ doesn&#039;t have an exact release date yet, and won&#039;t be coming out until sometime next year, so they have some time to plan and adjust if need&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Reliable Call of Duty leaker Tom Henderson recently tweeted out a response to another leaker named Anton Logvinov. The Russia-based insider, while echoing claims that the game is running well, claimed that the game is something fans will not want. Henderson describes himself as a &amp;quot;long time fan of the Battlefield franchise&amp;quot; and says that he does &amp;quot;believe it’s what fans want,&amp;quot; so it will be interesting to see which leaker is ultimately correct regarding Battlefield&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If anything, the changes made in Battlefield 3 &#039;s weapon customization served as a basis for what was to come. At the time, Battlefield 3 &#039;s rival was Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 , which was still utilizing its tried-and-true weapon customization that was introduced and refined in the previous Modern Warfare titles. Every weapon in that game was constrained to one attachment unless players selected the &amp;quot;Attachments&amp;quot; weapon proficiency that allowed for two attachments. Balance concerns likely would&#039;ve been the main concern with allowing more than one/two attachments per weapon, especially in tandem with the perk selection in the game&#039;s multipla&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Regardless, it will be some time until [https://battlefield2042pedia.com/ Battlefield 2042 Loadouts|Https://Battlefield2042Pedia.Com/] fans find out which leaker is correct and the friendly debate on the latest game&#039;s fan appeal is fully settled. Until then, messing around with the builds of Battlefield maps in Minecraft seems like a fun way for hardcore fans to start the waiting process for the reveal, as it seems like it is going to be a long &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Battlefield is often a much more team-focused game, especially with its classes and specialists designed to fulfill a specific role in battle. Leveraging that with weapon customization adds some flexibility, but doesn&#039;t compromise the series&#039; desire to make every player&#039;s role feel just as important as everyone else&#039;s. These classes encourage proper team composition and influences the way people play Battlefield , allowing them to clearly determine what their role is in the grand scheme of a Conquest or Rush match. But with a Gunsmith-like system, classes would feel less linear and give players options where previous games could not. Support members don&#039;t necessarily need to carry a big machine gun, or engineers don&#039;t need to be limited by close-range weap&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That being said, taking that prototype gameplay at face value, it&#039;s clear that EA is inferring these new improvements in player density/fidelity and destruction refinements will be Battlefield &#039;s key factors of success for next-gen . That&#039;s certainly not a bad thing, as having large-scale battlefields that evoke a simulation of war is exactly what Battlefield has done best in the past. The only major problem is that Battlefield 6 will need to make sure that these new additions are not just window dressing. These systemic improvements/refinements have to be done with purpose, not just for the sake of being technically impressive without any semblance of gameplay importa&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For the better part of the last decade, the Battlefield series was the popular place to go for large-scale online multiplayer in the FPS space, offering players the opportunity to shoot it out on large maps in 64-player matches. That number’s almost quaint nowadays in the age of battle royale shooters that can support up to 200 players per match , but if the latest from the rumor mill is to be believed, it’s going to be bumped up considerably for the upcoming Battlefield&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Via Official PlayStation Magazine , which can be viewed here , Battlefield 6 appears on a list of confirmed titles for the PlayStation 5, alongside other EA properties like Dragon Age 4 and The Sims 5 . EA has doubled down on both the consoles and release date after their announcements last month, suggesting progress is going well and no hiccups or delays are expected. In fact, OSM claims that details will be coming shortly, asking users to &amp;quot;come back next issue for more info&amp;quot;. While what the &amp;quot;more info&amp;quot; pertains to is entirely up to speculation, it&#039;s likely that the setting along with any major gameplay changes would be revealed, another signal that DICE are going ahead steadily on developm&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In terms of what was specifically shown, the gameplay from DICE is very ambiguous. It&#039;s clearly an early prototype of gameplay for the next Battlefield game, but the assets themselves don&#039;t appear to be any different from Battlefield 5 . It&#039;s very possible the prototype gameplay shown was a repurposing of assets from Battlefield 5 showcasing what next-gen processing is capable of. That being said, it shows about around a hundred of what appear to be rendered models (all potentially players) moving in a single space. There also was a scene showing a building collapsing, which was more than likely showcasing a new version of Battlefield &#039;s Destruction physics. Lastly, there were a few close-ups of an indistinct soldier&#039;s face rendered in high detail, though it wasn&#039;t clear if this was next-gen graphics rendered in-eng&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OLDBettina</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Benutzer:OLDBettina&amp;diff=59512</id>
		<title>Benutzer:OLDBettina</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://falone.eu/index.php?title=Benutzer:OLDBettina&amp;diff=59512"/>
		<updated>2026-04-10T14:18:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;OLDBettina: Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „I&amp;#039;m Madge and was born on 25 July 1989. My hobbies are Color Guard and Poker.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Here is my page; [https://battlefield2042pedia.com/ Battlefield 2042 Loadouts|Https://Battlefield2042Pedia.Com/]“&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I&#039;m Madge and was born on 25 July 1989. My hobbies are Color Guard and Poker.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Here is my page; [https://battlefield2042pedia.com/ Battlefield 2042 Loadouts|Https://Battlefield2042Pedia.Com/]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>OLDBettina</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>